Reply from Constant Méheut, journalist for The New York Times

1 min read
Featured Image

From: Constant Méheut (NYTimes)

Subject: New York Times

Date received: 2022-05-31 at 18:24 +0800 (China Standard Time)

To: Vincent B. Le Corre

Note: the email has been redacted for privacy. Also, READ THIS:

Dear Mr. [ Vincent B. Le Corre ],

Thank you very much for your emails. To be honest, I have to admit it’s a little bit difficult to follow and I am not sure I understand, yet, the link between everything you told me so far. I did understand, though, the “one chance out of four” fraud, but I am not sure I understand the other information you sent to me.

I am going to take the time to look at all of this in more detail, but if you could sum it all up in a few sentences, I would definitely appreciate it.

Kind regards,

Constant Méheut
The New York Times - Paris Bureau
+33 6 [Phone number, REDACTED FOR PRIVACY] / +33 1 [Phone number, REDACTED FOR PRIVACY]
@ConstantMeheut - Stories

To gain a clearer understanding of the sequence of events in this case, I invite you to view a detailed timeline at the following link:
This timeline provides a comprehensive overview of the key milestones and developments.


Vincent B. Le Corre

I am the key witness and whistleblower in the major criminal RICO case targeting McDonald’s Corporation and their accomplices for fraud, money laundering, and corruption of foreign officials and magistrates. Initially granted anonymity by the European Court of Human Rights (Rules 33 and 47 of the Rules of Court), I made the decision in August 2023 to temporarily go public with my identity. This decision, driven by concerns for my own safety and that of my loved ones, was taken despite the potential risks, hoping it will be temporary only and that I can return to anonymity soon.